2006 Tulane Football Preview
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33eb5/33eb5aa12f82def7012a9db022f585d9cde53335" alt=""
Tulane will present one of the 20 worst on field products in I-A. Period. The defense is wretched, the offense loaded with “if’s”. Scelfo is not a great coach- he’s a competent, average to the core, program head. Accordingly, he has not shown a consistent ability to really, really elevate talent- move a team’s win tally by two, three tallies.
Succor? Well, you could begin by weaving a coherent story that the offense could be kinda okay. There are no secrets here. The wide outs figure to be a plus- for all of Scelfo’s faults you gotta admit he assembles a group at WR each year that contribute. The offensive line is pretty brand new- but this is the first group of line players that has been brought along the right way: red-shirts, a year of playing together behind a veteran group of starters. They might be a nice surprise. After two years of my dogging Forte supporters- Matt looked pretty good in the spring. I am not saying he’ll garner his first coach/media vote for third-team all conference (i.e. the fifth best RB in the League) but he might, just might, help this campaign.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41e85/41e85c8997819cf329c6b95935067673f02ce870" alt=""
The Wave defense... many, many, many problems here. They couldn't stop the run with Cannon or pass. The schedule is harder- LSU & Auburn alone could score 100 points with 1300 yards of offense. Our League is offense friendly- teams go for cartoon-like numbers routinely. Add an offense that doesn't figure to be able to protect the defense consistently. Trouble.
Who has a worse linebacker situation than Tulane in C-USA? The defensive secondary couldn’t run or tackle last year; why should that be different? And every single year, we are told this is the year the defensive front steps up. They are like Ricard now- I won’t believe until I see it. Consequently, complete this sentence... they’ll keep Houston to less than 400 yards of offense because...?
Kicking game should be much better.
A real bad defense added to an offense that needs three things to go real right (QB, new o-line and Forte) to be decent... well, if Tulane were a BCS school, you could cheerfully pencil in two wins for this group.
But thank heavens for C-USA! It is a league filled with oh so many other teams with dire, unpleasant issues- an indifferent League, with so many busted outposts; you can never throw in the towel on a season.
Look at this week’s lines: Navy is -12 over East Carolina. Texas Tech is -26.5 over SMU. Oklahoma -21.5 over UAB. Florida -20 over USM. San Diego -2.5 over UTEP???
Tulane, in the bottom quartile of I-A programs, fits right in.
So while Tulane is probably a four TD underdog to, say, Texas Tech- the schedule inoculates Tulane against complete disaster. SMU, Rice & Army all come here. With this defense and quarterback, Tulane can’t play wontedly well enough to beat all three- but I cannot imagine losing two either. Someone in this League/schedule always disappoints: Marshall is already pretty bad, Mississippi State and Houston can get beat if they are asleep at the switch. Frankly, it is hard to be an underdog in nine games- and not get one by accident.
So that is where to put the Wave- get two of three from Rice, SMU and Army- steal one somewhere else- and get to three. A chance for four- but three is where I hang this hat.